知既可唔可以講下係咩黎~
同埋同日常生活有咩關係~？::24

批判性思考?唔太清楚
但照我睇就應該係判別是非對錯既思考
睇書講呢,思考方式有2種既
最基本既就係critical thinking
跟住再進階呢就係creative thinking
缺乏批判思考能力既人就會
人云亦云,盲目咁隨波逐流

我都係隨便講下咋,未必岩

[ 本帖最後由 amanda1000 於 2007-3-18 01:07 PM 編輯 ]

critical thinking 乜唔係對事件既判斷能力咩..~?
日常生活都會有用到, 例如做乜岩做乜唔岩, 分辨是非既能力... 基本上我地做每一個決定都係會經過 critical thinking... (我講緊既未必一定岩..~ xDD)
不過... 乜哩 d 唔係應該 under 心理學 / 哲學 架咩..~? ^^"

p.s: 岩岩上網搵過... 覺得幾得意... 如下:
Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. It includes the ability to engage in reflective and independent thinking.
Someone with critical thinking skills is able to do the following :

understand the logical connections between ideas
identify, construct and evaluate arguments
detect inconsistencies and common mistakes in reasoning
solve problems systematically
identify the relevance and importance of ideas
reflect on the justification of one's own beliefs and values

即係話 critical thinking 係一個有條理既思考模式
之後再上就好似樓上咁講, 係 creative thinking, 我諗你先生都係想你地慢慢 develope 去 creative thinking..~ xDDD
你應該都係用黎做功課架喇..~? 我唔譯做中文喇...~ xDD

WAKAKA，
我完全5知道你地UP緊咩東東，
好5明，
吖post滴

[ 本帖最後由 星月﹏＊ 於 2007-3-18 01:27 PM 編輯 ]

哈哈~唔該晒上面2位幫我做功課~~只係你2個講d野都有排我寫XD
但有d唔明點進階去creative thinking?

Quote:

原帖由 kiwi 於 2007-3-18 01:26 PM 發表
哈哈~唔該晒上面2位幫我做功課~~只係你2個講d野都有排我寫XD
但有d唔明點進階去creative thinking?

kakaka, 都估到你用黎做功課喇~!! 哈哈
既言係咁... 比多 d 英文你喇..~

Critical thinking promotes creativity.
To come up with a creative solution to a problem involves not just having new ideas. It must also be the case that the new ideas being generated are useful and relevant to the task at hand. Critical thinking plays a crucial role in evaluating new ideas, selecting the best ones and modifying them if necessary.

即係話要將舊既 solution 改善去更有效率地完成一件事就需要 creativity... 去證實佢就要 critical thinking

Critical thinking plays a crucial role in evaluating new ideas
係咪即係搵出個solution就要靠critical thinking?
而要去改善個solution令到佢更好就要靠creative thinking???::33

Quote:

原帖由 kiwi 於 2007-3-18 01:42 PM 發表
Critical thinking plays a crucial role in evaluating new ideas
係咪即係搵出個solution就要靠critical thinking?
而要去改善個solution令到佢更好就要靠creative thinking???::33

即係話要將舊既 solution 改善去更有效率地完成一件事就係 creative thinking, 而 critical thinking 就對 evaluation 有幫助
而 critical thinking 點樣"進階" 去 creative thinking 呢... 其實"進階"唔係一個太好既詞語...
應該話 critical thinking 係會幫到 creative thinking, 因為你既 creativity 所 create 出黎既野都要有用先可以整做一個 product
而當你有 idea 既時候你就要用 critical thinking 去判斷你既 creativity 有無用...
或者用 creative thinking 去諗下點改善一樣舊既野先可以將佢既效率提升, 然後再用 critical thinking 去斷定哩個 new idea 可唔可行

所以其實要搵出一個 solution 係要兩樣都有, 而亦都因為咁所以我話用進階哩個字眼其實唔係太適合

批判性思考不是一種專門用來批評別人的詭辯術﹐相反的﹐批判性思考是專門找出自己與別人的思考與論證錯誤的一門技巧﹐目的在於建構更有說服力的論證以及提昇自己的思考能力。因此﹐批判性思考的主要批判對象是想法、信念與論證而不是人﹐無論是別人的或是自己的想法﹐都以一種小心謹慎的態度來思考﹐盡可能的避免錯誤。批判性思考的價值是避免自己接收與產生錯誤想法而導致不良後果﹐對於無關緊要的想法不需太過在意而影響日常生活與人際關係。


相關且推薦網頁 : http://www.hfu.edu.tw/~cchi/critical%20thinking%20web/

哦~原來係噤~~
但係如果用CRITICAL THINKING 黎判斷我既creativity既話
噤唔係變左creative think 先到critical thinking??

Quote:

原帖由 kiwi 於 2007-3-18 01:56 PM 發表
哦~原來係噤~~
但係如果用CRITICAL THINKING 黎判斷我既creativity既話
噤唔係變左creative think 先到critical thinking??

所以我話其實唔係進唔進階, 因為創作同判斷係唔一樣, 不過兩者係 design 入面好有關係
講下 example...
我 identify 一個 problem 就係需要 critical thinking (其實可以唔駛 thinknig 添, 不過就當係判斷一個 problem la.. xDDDD)
緊住就需要用 critical thinking 去思考點先可以 solve 到個 problem, 再用 creative thinking 去 create 一個 solution
但係要確定哩個 creative thinking 所諗出黎既 solution 到底 work 唔 work 就需要用 critical thinking 去證實

所以其實見到 before 一個 solution come up, 要諗到點樣解決個問題先, 然後先有 solution, 而之後就係去確定哩個 solution 行得通

哦~~~我明喇！！！

勁wo~~唔讀design真係晒左你喇~~
仲有無d咩實例噤呀？

Quote:

原帖由 kiwi 於 2007-3-18 02:12 PM 發表
哦~~~我明喇！！！

勁wo~~唔讀design真係晒左你喇~~
仲有無d咩實例噤呀？

kaka, 我覺得哩 d 似係心理學多 d, 因為係人既思考方式..~ xDDD
實例..~? ::q9
hmmm... 例如你見到落雨你出街行個身會濕晒, 你用 critical thinking 就諗到如果頭頂有野遮住咪無事 lor...
咁用 creative thinking 就諗到個 idea 就係整 d 野拎住, 可以高過你個頭, 遮埋你個身既範圍
有左個 idea 係到就可以用 creative thinking 去 design 一把雨傘 (product/solution) 喇...
critical thinking 確實左可行後就整左一把大既雨傘喇
之後就係 identify 左大既雨傘好阻掟, 咁就用 citical thinking 諗... 把野細 d 咪得 lor..
creative thinking 後就整把關得既雨傘可以更慳位喇.... 確實可行就有把唔摺得, 不過關得既雨傘喇...
之後發覺都唔夠細, 重覆 critical --> creative --> critical 既步驟後就有 "縮骨遮" 既誕生...` xDDDD

當然哩個只係外型上... design 要諗既可能要加埋 material, 例如雨傘 e+ 用緊既布同第一把一定唔同, 可能第一把雨傘只係一支棍加塊板....
之後變布因為會輕 d, 改做半球狀咁 d 雨水唔會彈黎彈去又可以更全面幅蓋新體, 真係好鬼多野諗... (吹左咁耐都唔知岩唔岩 xDDD)

我諗到1個例子
假如有個人想由1個地方去另外1個地方
佢用critical thinking諗諗左個idea 如果唔洗我行噤就好~~
於是佢就用佢既creative thinking 諗到做架單車出黎
再用反critical thinking去諗係唔係真係可行......
可行既話就整左單車呢樣野出黎

或者又再用critical thinking identify左個problem就係踩單車都好晒力
佢就用佢既creative thiking 諗左汽車呢樣野~~~
又去用critical去諗可唔可行噤？？？
唔知呢個例子岩唔岩~~~
即係來來去去都係critical >>> creative>>> critical >>> creative.......循環噤？？

但如果係critical thinking証實係唔可能既話
就唔會再有下1個creative thinking出黎改善？

Quote:

原帖由 kiwi 於 2007-3-18 02:41 PM 發表
我諗到1個例子
假如有個人想由1個地方去另外1個地方
佢用critical thinking諗諗左個idea 如果唔洗我行噤就好~~
於是佢就用佢既creative thinking 諗到做架單車出黎
再用反critical thinking去諗係唔係真係可 ...

都岩啊..~
總之個 pattern 係...
identify problem > critical thinking to solve problem > creative thinking for ideas > critical thinking to prove ideas > action to make solution  (creativity to produce product?? 唔知點叫哩個 step)

我諗... 如果 critical thinking prove 左個 idea 唔可行就會再 creative thinking 諗過另一個 idea of solution, 唔會停左係到, unless 無 ideas 喇..
所以有時某 d product /solution 既進化會停頓左, 因為無 ideas 去整一個更好更完善既 solution / product, 但當有新既 ideas 又可行時哩個 product / solution 就會繼續 develope
當然仲有好多其他野會 take into account, 例如如果有新既 material 或者新既 technology 出現咁就可能會有新既 design
因為可能哩個 material 比舊既 material 更好, 咁就可以有更好既 design 出左黎, 其中一個例子就係...
用返你個 example, 單車, 可能以前單車既車輪係木既, 好硬, 好震, 唔會 last 好耐, 又無抓地力
跟住因為發現左有 rubber 哩個 material 存在, 車輪上面就加上車呔, 咁就會無咁震 + 有抓地力
之後有灌輸空氣入車呔既 technology, 咁車呔就唔再係實心, 輕 d 又可以無實心 rubber 呔咁震
掌握左空氣壓縮既 technology 就有埋避震, etc etc